Article April 23, 2025 Private Credit’s Data Bottleneck: Why Your Hedge Program Can’t Scale Discover why private credit firms struggle to scale hedge programs and how modern data infrastructure can transform risk management. Robert Showers Chief Revenue Officer In today’s market, scaling a private credit platform means scaling operational sophistication. Yet one of the most overlooked—and increasingly costly—barriers to growth is the fragmented way many firms manage hedge data. From interest rate swaps to FX forwards, the tools used to manage risk exposure haven’t kept up with the needs of modern portfolios. Too often, firms are still reliant on spreadsheets, manual inputs, and fragmented reporting pipelines. At best, this leads to inefficiency. At worst, it invites risk. The Hidden Complexity in Private Credit Risk Private credit investors often operate lean. Teams are optimized for deal origination, underwriting, and capital deployment—not back-office infrastructure. But as interest rate and currency exposures grow in scale and complexity, the limitations of legacy tools become more apparent. Typical symptoms include: Hedging programs tracked in Excel by one or two internal experts. Risk dashboards that require manual updates—or don’t exist at all. Difficulty reconciling positions across funds, strategies, and jurisdictions. Inability to respond in real-time to market changes or credit events. This is no longer sustainable. Credit investors are increasingly facing margin pressure and institutional scrutiny. Regulators, auditors, and LPs are all asking more sophisticated questions about risk governance and transparency. If your team can’t answer them quickly—or worse, can’t visualize your total exposure—you’ve already lost ground. Why the Problem Exists Most portfolio companies don’t have the infrastructure to manage their own hedges, so the responsibility falls to the sponsor. But traditional systems were never designed for portfolio-level hedging across dozens—or hundreds—of borrowers. And building bespoke infrastructure in-house is resource-intensive, slow, and hard to scale. There is a structural gap between the deal team’s expectations and what the operations team can deliver. The Risk of Delay We hear it often: “We’ll tackle this next year.” But waiting has a cost. A delay in hedge execution—even by a day—can have significant P&L impact. Poor visibility into current exposures increases the likelihood of over-hedging, under-hedging, or missing critical credit facility compliance terms. Manual reporting slows investor communication and erodes confidence during due diligence cycles or fundraising. As portfolios grow, these issues compound. The Path Forward: Tech-Enabled Advisory The answer is not to throw more headcount at the problem. It’s to rethink the operating model. At Derivative Path, we’ve partnered with leading private credit sponsors to deliver an integrated solution that combines advisory expertise with cloud-based technology. Our approach enables firms to: Automate hedge lifecycle management. Centralize exposure and P&L reporting. Integrate risk data with internal systems via API. Generate dashboards tailored to front office, finance, and compliance. Many firms have validated that this combination of advisory + tech is a force multiplier—not just for managing risk, but for accelerating scale. Conclusion: Operational Alpha Is Within Reach In a world where deal velocity and asset complexity are increasing, hedge data management can no longer be an afterthought. The private credit firms that win over the next decade will be those that invest early in scalable infrastructure. Not because it’s easy—but because the cost of not doing so is rising fast. It’s time to replace spreadsheets with strategy.